Genealogy Wise

The Genealogy & Family History Social Network

I was curious about how others are entering the wife's name into Legacy when the maiden name is not known. I have known a few users of Legacy that put an "X" in front of the last name of the wife to mark those that maiden names have not been found. This might cause some problems later when merging with Family Search or other GEDCOM downloads.

Views: 121

Replies to This Discussion

I leave it blank (hopefully to be added later) . Do the same for a husband that marries one of my line that I don't have one

of his names, sometimes it's the given sometimes it's his surname.

   ...lew...

I put the husband's last name using double brackets.  This gives me at least a clue of the family relationship when I'm looking at a name list. 

Likewise, if I don't know a first name.  For instance, if a daughter, Jane Doe Smith, is widowed and has moved back in with her parents in a census listing, you will know her married name, but not her husband's first name.  So I will name him [[Husband of Jane Doe]] Smith. 

 

The advantage of this is that you can exclude this information from reports very easily.

I find that anything other than a blank entry will give you issues with genealogical software.  Some people put in "unknown" but that gets you an error message.  I'd just leave it blank until you hopefully find a a surname.  At least that's how I handle the situation but others may do it differently.  I might use the "notes" field to specify the fact that the person is unknown but was the wife of so and so.
For unknown names I put "Firstname" or "Lastname" (without the quotation marks) as it applies.  Works for me!

RSS

Members

© 2024   Created by IIGSExecDirector.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service