Genealogy Wise

The Genealogy & Family History Social Network

From McCarthy Surname study FTDNA

Yes you are definitely Irish Type II. The mutations  I highlighted are based on an Irish Type II background. The defining Irish Type  II progenitor lived some time in the first millenium A.D. So all Irish Type II  people will have mutations which occurred since then, defining their  sub-branches.
I'm so glad that you have had a successful outcome  in contacting Cummings. As I said previously, " I agree it only needed a generation to omit the "r" in  O'Croimin (or variants!)"; who would have believed that a Cummings might trace  back to MacCarthy?  Do you have the kit number for Cummings? (Save me  searching for it!)
There is no reason at present to suppose you are  NOT descended from a McCarthy lineage.
Irish Type II is unusal in that it does not at  present have any defining SNP (except the very recently identified L1312) beyond  R-DF13 (which is common to many other lineages which do have two or more more  recent defining SNPs).  You could test for DF13 but I am sure you would be  positive for this. Apart from that, it's a case of waiting until the  professionals discover new SNPs (e.g, in the 1000 Genome Project) which are good  candidates.  L1312 has proved positive in  ONE Irish Type II person only. He, however, has a very distinctive haplotype  (i.e mutations away from Irish Type II) and no others as yet to my knowledge  have proven positive for this. Quote from a forum: "L1312 was found using the  V22 primers, which have been around a while, so I was able to re-blast the V22  chromatograms for the three previous Type II Irish (all are variety  13*-1511A-T2*) WTYs. Kits 11211 (O'Donoghue), 115485 (Mahoney), and 179653  (O'Sullivan) are all L1312-."
If you wanted to invest further my recommendation  would be to extend to 111 markers (while the FTDNA current sale is on).   The more (in McCarthy Groups A and B) do this the better chance we have of  working out the tree structures over the past 1000 years.
Kind regards = marked private (refence can be provided)

Views: 289

Comment

You need to be a member of Genealogy Wise to add comments!

Join Genealogy Wise

Comment by Susan J. Barretta on March 7, 2013 at 8:18pm

The title of your post "McCarthy branches and nicknames Reagh, Rabagh, Crimmeen, Spawnach, Mucklagh, Cawsca, Sowney, Cunic, Tollin, Bawny, Forshing" is an identical word order copy out of a posting that I published on 22-Apr-2010 called "McCarthy nicknames."  That link is here:

http://www.genealogywise.com/group/mccarthy/forum/topics/mccarthy-n...

In that posting I attributed my source.  Your posting does not.

I do not even see a link back to Nigel McCarthy and the McCarthy DNA project.


Length of time researching and desire to share information does not remove the responsibility to attribute sources.

Members

© 2024   Created by IIGSExecDirector.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service