In the past and for many years, I owned an Apple computer store which also sold a variety of manufactures' computers (most of those early computer stores are long since out of business). Since selling off my computer store business, I continue to teach a lot of classes about genealogy programs and online resources which gives people the idea I might… Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 25, 2010 at 10:38pm —
No Comments
Quoting from the
Community Trees website,
Community Trees are lineage-linked genealogies from specific time periods and geographic localities around the world. The information also includes the supporting sources. Most of the
genealogies are joint projects between FamilySearch and others who live
locally or have expertise in the area or records used to create the
genealogies. Each Community Tree is a…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 22, 2010 at 8:01am —
1 Comment
Genealogy is not an exact science. What we know about the historical
past and particularly our family is based on our experience. Some of the
information is likely very accurate, while it is entirely possible that
some of the things we know, or think we know, about our family are
entirely false. Whether our beliefs about our family are based in fact
or not, depends to a great extent on our system of justified beliefs,
that is, those things we "know" to be true from…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 21, 2010 at 6:14pm —
No Comments
Right out of the chute, plagiarism is not a criminal act. The closest
legal involvement is with copyright infringement or violation claims.
Certainly, extensive plagiarism is almost always also a violation of
copyright. To quote from the University of Arizona Libraries website on
Avoiding Plagiarism,
"Plagiarism is using others' ideas and words without clearly
acknowledging the source of…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 15, 2010 at 7:30am —
No Comments
Some of the most valuable documents for family history research consist
of diaries, journals and letters. From time to time, copyright issues
arise concerning these types of documents, especially if the text of the
documents or a facsimile is being published either online or in a
printed format. The first rule is that physical possession of the
documents does not confer any right to the copyright. I have found that
the possessor of the document usually incorrectly…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 13, 2010 at 9:04am —
No Comments
This post is a continuation of the discussion in my last post, Can I obtain a copyright of a copy of an old document? The commentary is directed at websites that claim copyrights to digitized images of old documents of interest to genealogists, such as U.S. Census records, wills, deeds, maps and other such items. Let's suppose that as an attorney, I have read all…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 12, 2010 at 12:27pm —
No Comments
Recent news releases in the genealogical community highlight additions
to more huge online databases of historic images, including private
documents such as journals, wills, maps and other such items. Many of
these images are put online by companies trying to charge a fee for some
aspect of either searching or reproducing the documents. This raises a
more than academic question, can anyone obtain copyright protection by
virtue of scanning an old documents and…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 11, 2010 at 9:08pm —
No Comments
There are a number of ways to digitize documents and photographs. The
two primary ways are to use some form of a scanner or in the
alternative, some kind of digital camera. Following is a number of
digital files of the same document acquired for the computer with
different options. In each case the document was scanned or photographed
at the optimal level for the device. The file was saved as a .tif file
and the image was magnified to 200% of the original. The…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 9, 2010 at 8:07pm —
No Comments
One recurring question is whether or not the vast number of records
being digitized on the Internet actually increase anyone's chances of
finding their ancestors? From my standpoint the answer is a resounding
yes. This last week had proof of the possibility, one from Sinaloa,
Mexico and another from the Midwest U.S.
It has been the case for sometime that the Family History Library had a
very high percentage of the Mexican Catholic Church Parish Registers…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 8, 2010 at 10:08pm —
No Comments
I was an awful note taker at the university and in law school.
Especially in law school, I would watch the other students scribble
furiously in their notebooks, so I would copy their behavior and write
copious notes from every class. There was just one problem, when I got
home and went back through my notes, they were absolutely meaningless.
It was not that I couldn't write legibly, it was just that whatever I
wrote down made no sense. I finally got to the point of…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 6, 2010 at 9:42am —
No Comments
In the BYU Continuing Education announcement of the Conference on Family
History and Genealogy recently concluded, the senior product manager
for FamilySearch, Daniel C. Lawyer, was scheduled to present "
The Future of FamilySearch (Something Big is Coming Soon)"
Although there were a lot of comments about a presentation by Curt B.
Witcher on the coming Dark Ages of Genealogy and a few news accounts of
the presentation…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 2, 2010 at 8:45am —
No Comments
In a recent comment to my statement about old royal pedigree, Martin said,
It's an incorrect opinion. You've confused two things. I don't believe in lines going back to Adam either. However, I can verify using modern genealogical standards, my line back to medieval
royalty and that royalty back to the early dark ages (about 400-600
A.D.). So it is real genealogy and real history.
Given Martin's expertise in genealogy, it is highly likely that his…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on August 1, 2010 at 2:57pm —
No Comments
There have been several comments in Blog posts about a news article
reporting a presentation given by Curt B. Witcher, the manager of The
Genealogy Center at the Allen County Public Library. Unfortunately, my
access to Mr. Witcher's comment come only from a
Mormon Times article by Michael De Groote.
Even though I really enjoy attending the BYU…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 30, 2010 at 5:20pm —
No Comments
Several recent conversations concerning genealogy have ended rather
suddenly, on my part, when the person claimed to have his or her
genealogy "back to Adam." I really don't have any polite way to respond
to that conclusion. I have written before about the physical
impossibility of obtaining such a lengthy pedigree, but recent
conversations have caused me to return to the subject. The real question
is where does genealogical research end as a practical and…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 28, 2010 at 8:33pm —
2 Comments
When New FamilySearch was introduced to Mesa, Arizona back in October of
2007, one of the first things we all did was to use the dispute
function to tell the world we disagreed with their inaccurate or wrong
information in the file. I literally spent hours and hours searching
through the files, disputing all of the wrongly included children,
incorrect marriages and other issues. Over time, it became apparent that
the program had no real way to make corrections.…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 27, 2010 at 8:51am —
No Comments
In a comment to my last post, Karen of
Genealogy Frame of Mind named
the activity of gathering ancestors from online databases as "Click and
Claim." I like this designation. It summarizes the video game-like
activity of going online and copying names down into a local database
without any discrimination as to the accuracy of the information and
without even knowing the identity of the individuals being added to…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 25, 2010 at 8:28am —
No Comments
During the past week or so, I had the following conversation with a
friend I was helping with his genealogy. We were using RootsMagic 4 to
look match his pedigree names with those in New FamilySearch. The
following is only slightly edited:
Me:
See that green arrow in New FamilySearch? Just click on the arrow.
Friend:
This shows that this person needs to be sealed to his wife.
Me:
But look, there are three wives with the same name and… Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 24, 2010 at 9:52pm —
No Comments
I am now getting used to my new iPhone 4 and I am even more impressed
than I was initially. As a side note, this particular cell phone (if you
can still call it that) is not for everyone. The iPhone is currently
supplied only through AT&T and a required data plan, plus phone
service can cost over $100 a month. We use our phones for our business
and can justify the price for the convenience. I receive calendar items,
E-mail and telephone messages instantly from…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 21, 2010 at 6:37pm —
No Comments
There are still a significant number of people who use only paper copies
of their genealogical data. The reasons for doing so, run from a lack
of computer knowledge, to comments about being better able to visualize
the information on paper. I have long since learned that I do not get
into discussions with these people about using computers. It is not
productive. I was very early in adopting computers for my genealogy,
using an…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on July 20, 2010 at 9:54pm —
1 Comment
With the upcoming BYU Conference on Family History & Genealogy (BYU
Campus July 27 - 30, 2010) it is likely that FamilySearch will take the
opportunity to announce or introduce changes to either
New FamilySearch or the older
FamilySearch.org Website. The
FamilySearch.org Website is the best candidate for changes. There has
been a
Beta test of a…
Continue
Added by James Tanner on June 30, 2010 at 9:44pm —
2 Comments