I have received yet another enquiry based on family trees hosted on ancestry.com which contain wrong information.
Now, I am not for one moment saying that everything on my family tree, freely accessible on the internet (though not right now, but that is a different story), is 100% correct, but my database allows anyone to 'Suggest' corrections. I have, for example, recently made a major change based on outcomes from DNA research
However, correcting something on Ancestry is a different matter. Some trees have been untouched for years, and so making contact with the owner is problematical.
The DNA example, above, still exists on several trees on Ancestry. How can the previously published line of descent be corrected? As far as I can see, it cannot.
Comment
Those with no cognitive abilities of their own don't understand that if they post a '' Sows Ear '' for lineage , ten years from now , Ancestry.com will still be marketing that ''Sows Ear'' as gospel truth , when in fact the Mormons running that site are only in it for the money . Every shred of information wrong or right goes into that Data-base and seeps out like sewage onto other sites . The misinformation is pure profit .
Good luck contacting the erroneous posters
The good, BAD & UGLY of genealogy. I have noticed that too about errors. I do not subscribe to Ancestry as a lot of the trees are also on WorldConnect on RootsWeb (owned by Ancestry) which is free. People just have to be aware that the lineages can be full of errors (some actually post disclaimers, which it appears others ignore).
I am finding about an 80%+ error rate on the posted genealogies. You can post notes on individuals correcting the errors (and I strongly encourage you to do so). I posted to about 1,600 sites correcting some data on an ancestry of mine. The newer genealogies I noticed did make corrections. You have to just keep plugging away. I do not think that there is a simple answer or solution. I imagine in 50 years or so that our descendants will have complete genealogies but totally wrong.
Genealogy requires research, logic, reading, study, etc. but as one person said it was just a "hobby" ( wonder what his or her knitting projects look like). This attitude extends into the professional world. Historians & biographers tend to look at genealogists with a judging eye but you should see the errors that creep up in their "scholarly works" when it includes genealogical material or data. Ok, blew off my steam, nothing is perfect, just sad so much imperfection is continued to be spread. Jim.
© 2024 Created by IIGSExecDirector. Powered by
You need to be a member of Genealogy Wise to add comments!
Join Genealogy Wise